It is what I know and what I am comfortable with. Everything else is handled elsewhere within ACDSee. That may be because it's a simple resize utility with how much to enlarge, what algorythm to use and what grades of sharpness. However, I would rate ACDSee tops for ease of use. Topaz was an obvious winner in terms of IQ, and I think, more amenable to uses other than printing In terms of absolute image quality on this photo, I would personally rate themĪCDSee and ON1 were very close in IQ, I wouldn't argue if others reversed the order on those two. But I think for adding room to crop, Gigapixel AI would probably be better. I suspect all 3 would do well with printing a simple 2X enlargement.

I can do better, depending on what I what to do with the enlargement.

I am unlikely to enlarge my files beyond 2X, so that is what I tested with. I've been using the proprietary 'ClearIQZ' model so far built into ACDSee, and I wanted to see if I could do better. As an otherwise happy m43s shooter, I'm thinking it might be useful at times.

I've been thinking about getting an enlargement utility lately. A 'SORTA' stream of consciousness test & review, where I prove my ability to make no decisions whatsoever!

Driver easy pro crack